Tricia L Dahl

Female, Age 52 Wallingford, Connecticut

Tricia L Dahl is a 52 years old female, born on Friday, 25th of June 1971. She will turn 53 on June 25, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 8 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Tricia is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 14, 2002. Our records show David Edward Dahl (52) as possible relative.

Overview of Tricia L Dahl

Age: 52

Gender: female

Birth year: 1971

Lives in: Wallingford

Phone number: 203-284-3534

Tricia L Dahl's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 14, 2002

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Cook Hill School

Voter ID: 002729939

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

Tricia L Dahl Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Tricia L Dahl

5 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
5 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
5 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
6 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
6 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
7 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
7 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
9 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
9 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation
9 Jeremy Wood Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3432
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Tricia L Dahl's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Wallingford, Ct
Born on: Sunday, 17th of January 1971
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $109,104

Net Worth: $398,862

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.