1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06492 Wallingford
  4. Poppy Lane

Richard Louis Palombo Jr

Male, Age 65 Wallingford, Connecticut

Richard Louis Palombo Jr is a 65 years old male, born on Wednesday, 22nd of October 1958. He will turn 66 on October 22, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 2 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059 and is not affiliated with any political party. Richard is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 13, 2012. Our records show Patrice K Palombo (64) as possible relative.

Overview of Richard Louis Palombo Jr

Age: 65

Gender: male

Birth year: 1958

Lives in: Wallingford

Richard Louis Palombo Jr's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 13, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 008

Polling place: Wallingford Senior Center

Voter ID: 002715329

Congressional District: 003

House District: 090

Senate District: 034

Richard Louis Palombo Jr Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

2 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Richard Louis Palombo Jr

Kristy L Ferguson(49)
1 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6036
No known party affiliation
Dwight C Hunter(79)
4 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059
No known party affiliation
Xiaohua Huang(66)
6 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059
No known party affiliation
Anna Maria Torda(38)
8 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059
No known party affiliation
Michael J Torda(41)
8 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059
No known party affiliation
Candace Mary Chieppo(50)
10 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 2 Poppy Lane, Wallingford, Ct 06492-6059

Related Persons

Richard Louis Palombo Jr's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(64)
Wallingford, Ct
Born on: Sunday, 10th of May 1959
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $111,092

Net Worth: $269,677

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.