Jacquelin Perezares

Female, Age 58 Danbury, Connecticut

Jacquelin Perezares is a 58 years old female, born on Saturday, 22nd of August 1964. She will turn 59 on August 22, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 29 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jacquelin is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 11, 2002.

Overview of Jacquelin Perezares

Age: 58

Gender: female

Birth year: 1964

Lives in: Danbury

Jacquelin Perezares's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 11, 2002

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 09

District: 003

Polling place: Stadley Rough School

Voter ID: 002687559

Congressional District: 005

House District: 109

Senate District: 024

Jacquelin Perezares Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jacquelin Perezares

25 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
25 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
26 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
26 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
28 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
28 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
28 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
29 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
29 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
30 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
30 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-0000
No known party affiliation
31 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
31 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
31 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation
31 White Oak Drive, Danbury, 06810-4176
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $82,742

Net Worth: $63,595

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.