Ilda Dos Amaral

Female, Age 91 Danbury, Connecticut

Ilda Dos Amaral is a 91 years old female, born on Friday, 31st of July 1931. She will turn 92 on July 31, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 139 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6925 and is not affiliated with any political party. Ilda is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1800.

Overview of Ilda Dos Amaral

Age: 91

Gender: female

Birth year: 1931

Lives in: Danbury

Ilda Dos Amaral's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1800

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 10

District: 004

Polling place: Shelter Rock School Gym

Voter ID: 002679317

Congressional District: 005

House District: 110

Senate District: 024

Ilda Dos Amaral Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Ilda Dos Amaral

133 Triangle Street 2, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
133 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
133 Triangle Street 2, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
133 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
133 Triangle Street 2, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
135 Triangle Street 1st Fl, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
137 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
142 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6950
No known party affiliation
142 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6950
No known party affiliation
143 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
143 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
143 Triangle Street 3, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
143 Triangle Street 3, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
143 Triangle Street 3, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation
145 Triangle Street, Danbury, 06810-6925
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $104,429

Net Worth: $1,040,173

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.