Selma S Conte

Female, Age 57 Stamford , Connecticut

Selma S Conte is a 57 years old female, born on Thursday, 17th of March 1966. She will turn 58 on March 17, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 35 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802 and is not affiliated with any political party. Selma is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 4, 1996.

Overview of Selma S Conte

Age: 57

Gender: female

Birth year: 1967

Lives in: Stamford

Selma S Conte's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 4, 1996

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 015

Polling place: Springdale School Rear

Voter ID: 002592198

Congressional District: 004

House District: 147

Senate District: 027

Selma S Conte Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Selma S Conte

29 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
29 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
30 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1801
No known party affiliation
30 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1801
No known party affiliation
30 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1801
No known party affiliation
34 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1801
No known party affiliation
34 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1801
No known party affiliation
35 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
35 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
37 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
37 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
37 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
37 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
37 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation
37 Arthur Place, Stamford , Ct 06906-1802
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $5,762

Net Worth: $90,190

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.