Kecia Fields

Female, Age 51 Stamford , Connecticut

Kecia Fields is a 51 years old female, born on Thursday, 20th of July 1972. She will turn 52 on July 20, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 638 Cove Road 5, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Kecia is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 20, 1992.

Overview of Kecia Fields

Age: 51

Gender: female

Birth year: 1973

Lives in: Stamford

Kecia Fields's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 20, 1992

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Murphy School

Voter ID: 002583202

Congressional District: 004

House District: 148

Senate District: 027

Kecia Fields Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kecia Fields

637 Cove Road B16, Stamford , Ct 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road B12, Stamford , Ct 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road C4, Stamford , Ct 06902-5405
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road D13, Stamford , Ct 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road B2, Stamford , Ct 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road C5, Stamford , Ct 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road A1, Stamford , Ct 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
638 Cove Road 6, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454
No known party affiliation
638 Cove Road 2, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454
No known party affiliation
638 Cove Road 1, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454
No known party affiliation
638 Cove Road 5, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454
No known party affiliation
638 Cove Road 7, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454
No known party affiliation
638 Cove Road 2, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454
No known party affiliation
638 Cove Road 1, Stamford , Ct 06902-5454
No known party affiliation
656 Cove Road, Stamford , Ct 06902-5426
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $35,192

Net Worth: $477,139

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.