Aldo F. Aiello

Unknown, Age 72 Stamford , Connecticut

Aldo F. Aiello is a 72 years old unknown gender, born on Wednesday, 9th of May 1951. This person will turn 73 on May 09, 2024. Our records show this person currently resides at 19 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1538 and is not affiliated with any political party. Aldo is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 7, 1991.

Overview of Aldo F. Aiello

Age: 72

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1951

Lives in: Stamford

Aldo F. Aiello's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 7, 1991

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 014

Polling place: Dolan Middle School

Voter ID: 002577672

Congressional District: 004

House District: 144

Senate District: 027

Aldo F. Aiello Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Aldo F. Aiello

8 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1513
No known party affiliation
9 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1538
No known party affiliation
9 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1538
No known party affiliation
9 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1538
No known party affiliation
16 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-0000
No known party affiliation
16 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-0000
No known party affiliation
19 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1538
No known party affiliation
19 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1538
No known party affiliation
20 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1513
No known party affiliation
20 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1513
No known party affiliation
20 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1513
No known party affiliation
27 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1538
No known party affiliation
28 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1513
No known party affiliation
28 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1513
No known party affiliation
36 Lund Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06907-1513
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $85,556

Net Worth: $367,120

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.