John E. Schnefke

Unknown, Age 70 Stamford , Connecticut

John E. Schnefke is a 70 years old unknown gender, born on Thursday, 30th of April 1953. This person will turn 71 on April 30, 2025. Our records show this person currently resides at 90 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4727 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. John is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 15, 1988.

Overview of John E. Schnefke

Age: 70

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1954

Lives in: Stamford

John E. Schnefke's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 15, 1988

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 020

Polling place: Northeast School

Voter ID: 002574329

Congressional District: 004

House District: 147

Senate District: 027

John E. Schnefke Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for John E. Schnefke

20 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4727
No known party affiliation
20 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4727
No known party affiliation
37 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4728
No known party affiliation
37 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4728
No known party affiliation
54 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-0000
No known party affiliation
54 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-0000
No known party affiliation
61 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4728
No known party affiliation
90 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4727
No known party affiliation
99 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4728
No known party affiliation
100 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4725
No known party affiliation
100 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4725
No known party affiliation
117 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4726
No known party affiliation
117 Gutzon Borglum Road, Stamford , Ct 06903-4726
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $88,412

Net Worth: $899,457

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.