Don Wells

Male, Age 71 Waterbury , Connecticut

Don Wells is a 71 years old male, born on Wednesday, 11th of June 1952. He will turn 72 on June 11, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 5 Hill Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3450 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Don is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 22, 1984.

Overview of Don Wells

Age: 71

Gender: male

Birth year: 1952

Lives in: Waterbury

Don Wells's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 22, 1984

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 01

District: 072

Polling place: Mount Olive A M E Zion Church

Voter ID: 002531117

Congressional District: 005

House District: 072

Senate District: 015

Don Wells Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Don Wells

5 Hill Street E, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3450
No known party affiliation
5 Hill Street A, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3450
No known party affiliation
5 Hill Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3450
No known party affiliation
5 Hill Street A, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3450
No known party affiliation
5 Hill Street C, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3450
No known party affiliation
26 Hill Street 4s, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3403
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street 1s, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street 2s, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street 3, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street 25, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street 1, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation
28 Hill Street 2nd Fl, Waterbury , Ct 06704-3407
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $70,216

Net Worth: $435,162

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.