Jose D Muniz

Male, Age 51 Waterbury , Connecticut

Jose D Muniz is a 51 years old male, born on Thursday, 4th of May 1972. He will turn 52 on May 04, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 163 Mark Lane A20, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2469 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jose is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 30, 2002.

Overview of Jose D Muniz

Age: 51

Gender: male

Birth year: 1972

Lives in: Waterbury

Jose D Muniz's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 30, 2002

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 05

District: 072

Polling place: Edward D Bergin Apartments

Voter ID: 002509185

Congressional District: 005

House District: 072

Senate District: 015

Jose D Muniz Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jose D Muniz

123 Mark Lane 6, Waterbury , Ct 06704-0000
No known party affiliation
123 Mark Lane 6, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2400
No known party affiliation
123 Mark Lane 5, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2400
No known party affiliation
123 Mark Lane 2, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2400
No known party affiliation
123 Mark Lane 4, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2400
No known party affiliation
123 Mark Lane 1, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2400
No known party affiliation
150 Mark Lane O2, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2437
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane 18, Waterbury , Ct 06704-0000
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane 9, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2469
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane 15, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2469
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2469
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane 12, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2469
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane 8, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2469
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane 16, Waterbury , Ct 06704-2469
No known party affiliation
163 Mark Lane 18, Waterbury , Ct 06704-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $32,661

Net Worth: $388,180

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.