Darrell Pratt

Male, Age 49 Hartford , Connecticut

Darrell Pratt is a 49 years old male, born on Wednesday, 23rd of January 1974. He will turn 50 on January 23, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 47 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-6313 and is not affiliated with any political party. Darrell is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 31, 2019.

Overview of Darrell Pratt

Age: 49

Gender: male

Birth year: 1974

Lives in: Hartford

Darrell Pratt's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 31, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 019

Polling place: Bulkeley High School

Voter ID: 002450716

Congressional District: 001

House District: 004

Senate District: 001

Darrell Pratt Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Darrell Pratt

45 Bond Street 3w, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
45 Bond Street Apt 1w, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
45 Bond Street 1w, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
45 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
46 Bond Street 1w, Hartford , Ct 06114-1317
No known party affiliation
46 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-1317
No known party affiliation
46 Bond Street 3w, Hartford , Ct 06114-0000
No known party affiliation
47 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
47 Bond Street 3fl, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
47 Bond Street 1e, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
48 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-1317
No known party affiliation
49 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-1318
No known party affiliation
50 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-1317
No known party affiliation
52 Bond Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-1317
No known party affiliation
52 Bond Street 1fl, Hartford , Ct 06114-1317
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $22,529

Net Worth: $707,209

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.