Robert Edward Lee

Male, Age 74 Enfield, Connecticut

Robert Edward Lee is a 74 years old male, born on Tuesday, 1st of March 1949. He will turn 75 on March 01, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 4 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5817 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Robert is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 26, 1984.

Overview of Robert Edward Lee

Age: 74

Gender: male

Birth year: 1949

Lives in: Enfield

Phone number: 860-745-1053

Robert Edward Lee's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 26, 1984

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 158

Polling place: Enfield Senior Center

Voter ID: 002044884

Congressional District: 002

House District: 058

Senate District: 007

Robert Edward Lee Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Robert Edward Lee

1 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5832
No known party affiliation
2 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5801
No known party affiliation
2 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5801
No known party affiliation
3 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5818
No known party affiliation
3 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5818
No known party affiliation
5 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5818
No known party affiliation
5 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5818
No known party affiliation
6 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5817
No known party affiliation
6 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5817
No known party affiliation
7 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5818
No known party affiliation
7 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5818
No known party affiliation
8 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5817
No known party affiliation
9 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5818
No known party affiliation
10 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5817
No known party affiliation
12 Windham Road, Enfield, Ct 06082-5817
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $67,975

Net Worth: $480,685

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.