Mary E. Umgelter

Female, Age 80 Enfield, Connecticut

Mary E. Umgelter is a 80 years old female, born on Friday, 15th of October 1943. She will turn 81 on October 15, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 23 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4120 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Mary is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 9, 2000.

Overview of Mary E. Umgelter

Age: 80

Gender: female

Birth year: 1943

Lives in: Enfield

Phone number: 860-749-6453

Mary E. Umgelter's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 9, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 359

Polling place: Enfield Municipal Annex

Voter ID: 002036644

Congressional District: 002

House District: 059

Senate District: 007

Mary E. Umgelter Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Mary E. Umgelter

7 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4120
No known party affiliation
10 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
10 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
10 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
26 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
26 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
31 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4120
No known party affiliation
31 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4120
No known party affiliation
31 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4120
No known party affiliation
34 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
34 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
39 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4120
No known party affiliation
39 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4120
No known party affiliation
42 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation
42 Putnam Lane, Enfield, Ct 06082-4121
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $102,230

Net Worth: $972,643

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.