Debra R Ruckergrumley

Female, Age 60 Windsor, Connecticut

Debra R Ruckergrumley is a 60 years old female, born on Thursday, 17th of January 1963. She will turn 61 on January 17, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 9 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3240 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Debra is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 13, 2017.

Overview of Debra R Ruckergrumley

Age: 60

Gender: female

Birth year: 1963

Lives in: Windsor

Debra R Ruckergrumley's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 13, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: John F Kennedy School

Voter ID: 001824193

Congressional District: 001

House District: 005

Senate District: 002

Debra R Ruckergrumley Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Debra R Ruckergrumley

9 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3240
No known party affiliation
15 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3240
No known party affiliation
16 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
16 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
25 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3240
No known party affiliation
25 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3240
No known party affiliation
25 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3240
No known party affiliation
28 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
28 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
28 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
28 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
28 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
28 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
28 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3239
No known party affiliation
31 Craigs Road, Windsor, Ct 06095-3240
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $21,647

Net Worth: $1,389,815

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.