Rukma Sunalini Jacob

Female, Age 89 North Haven, Connecticut

Rukma Sunalini Jacob is a 89 years old female, born on Sunday, 30th of October 1932. She will turn 90 on October 30, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 19 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Rukma is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 19, 1988.

Overview of Rukma Sunalini Jacob

Age: 89

Gender: female

Birth year: 1933

Lives in: North Haven

Rukma Sunalini Jacob's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 19, 1988

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Clintonville Elementary School

Voter ID: 001731939

Congressional District: 003

House District: 087

Senate District: 034

Rukma Sunalini Jacob Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rukma Sunalini Jacob

6 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2846
No known party affiliation
9 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844
No known party affiliation
15 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844
No known party affiliation
15 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844
No known party affiliation
15 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844
No known party affiliation
16 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2848
No known party affiliation
16 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2848
No known party affiliation
19 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844
No known party affiliation
20 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2848
No known party affiliation
24 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2848
No known party affiliation
27 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844
No known party affiliation
27 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2844
No known party affiliation
28 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2848
No known party affiliation
28 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2848
No known party affiliation
28 Welch Road, North Haven, 06473-2848
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $110,071

Net Worth: $199,582

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.