Carrie A Luciano

Female, Age 60 New Canaan , Connecticut

Carrie A Luciano is a 60 years old female, born on Sunday, 3rd of December 1961. She will turn 61 on December 03, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 49 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6208 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Carrie is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 12, 1996. Our records show James J Luciano (57), Katherine R Luciano (24) and Emily A Luciano (27) as possible relatives.

Overview of Carrie A Luciano

Age: 60

Gender: female

Birth year: 1962

Lives in: New Canaan

Phone number: 203-966-4463

Carrie A Luciano's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 12, 1996

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: New Canaan High School Gym

Voter ID: 001720729

Congressional District: 004

House District: 125

Senate District: 036

Carrie A Luciano Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Carrie A Luciano

31 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6207
No known party affiliation
31 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6207
No known party affiliation
39 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6207
No known party affiliation
39 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6207
No known party affiliation
39 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6207
No known party affiliation
43 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6208
No known party affiliation
43 Brinckerhoff Avenue, New Canaan , 06840-6208
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Carrie A Luciano's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

New Canaan , Ct
Born on: Saturday, 18th of September 1965
Gender: Male
New Canaan , Ct
Born on: Thursday, 30th of October 1997
Gender: Female
New Canaan , Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 25th of July 1995
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $13,239

Net Worth: $1,316,825

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.