Brian J Hill

Male, Age 48 Guilford , Connecticut

Brian J Hill is a 48 years old male, born on Saturday, 13th of September 1975. He will turn 49 on September 13, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 646 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Brian is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 21, 2006.

Overview of Brian J Hill

Age: 48

Gender: male

Birth year: 1975

Lives in: Guilford

Phone number: 203-884-2082

Brian J Hill's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 21, 2006

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Melissa Jones School

Voter ID: 001634584

Congressional District: 003

House District: 086

Senate District: 012

Brian J Hill Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Brian J Hill

609 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1113
No known party affiliation
612 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
612 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
612 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
624 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
628 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
628 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
646 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
646 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1150
No known party affiliation
780 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1149
No known party affiliation
780 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1149
No known party affiliation
780 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1149
No known party affiliation
780 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1149
No known party affiliation
798 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1149
No known party affiliation
798 Lake Drive, Guilford , Ct 06437-1149
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $97,012

Net Worth: $840,499

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.