Michele Lee Gibson

Unknown, Age 53 Griswold , Connecticut

Michele Lee Gibson is a 53 years old unknown gender, born on Sunday, 22nd of June 1969. This person will turn 54 on June 22, 2024. Our records show this person currently resides at 22 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3409 and is not affiliated with any political party. Michele is registered to vote in Connecticut since December 31, 2019.

Overview of Michele Lee Gibson

Age: 53

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Griswold

Michele Lee Gibson's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: December 31, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Griswold High School

Voter ID: 001585384

Congressional District: 002

House District: 045

Senate District: 018

Michele Lee Gibson Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Michele Lee Gibson

22 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3409
No known party affiliation
34 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3411
No known party affiliation
42 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3412
No known party affiliation
68 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3415
No known party affiliation
68 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3415
No known party affiliation
68 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3415
No known party affiliation
68 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3415
No known party affiliation
74 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3415
No known party affiliation
90 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3416
No known party affiliation
90 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3416
No known party affiliation
99 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3410
No known party affiliation
102 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3417
No known party affiliation
107 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3410
No known party affiliation
111 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3410
No known party affiliation
111 Latham Drive, Griswold , 06351-3410
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $8,328

Net Worth: $954,093

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.