Deanne M Fagan

Female, Age 57 Putnam , Connecticut

Deanne M Fagan is a 57 years old female, born on Friday, 10th of December 1965. She will turn 58 on December 10, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 284 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2702 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Deanne is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1800.

Overview of Deanne M Fagan

Age: 57

Gender: female

Birth year: 1966

Lives in: Putnam

Deanne M Fagan's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1800

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Town Garage

Voter ID: 001576986

Congressional District: 002

House District: 051

Senate District: 029

Deanne M Fagan Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Deanne M Fagan

225 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2701
No known party affiliation
228 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2700
No known party affiliation
229 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2701
No known party affiliation
229 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2701
No known party affiliation
239 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2701
No known party affiliation
239 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2701
No known party affiliation
239 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2701
No known party affiliation
292 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2702
No known party affiliation
292 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2702
No known party affiliation
295 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2740
No known party affiliation
295 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2740
No known party affiliation
300 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2702
No known party affiliation
300 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2702
No known party affiliation
310 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2702
No known party affiliation
310 Walnut Street, Putnam , Ct 06260-2702
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $47,690

Net Worth: $453,302

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.