Sonja Lomholt

Unknown, Age 82 Madison, Connecticut

Sonja Lomholt is a 82 years old unknown gender, born on Sunday, 2nd of November 1941. This person will turn 83 on November 02, 2024. Our records show this person currently resides at 29 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2062 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Sonja is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1800.

Overview of Sonja Lomholt

Age: 82

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1942

Lives in: Madison

Phone number: 203-245-1642

Sonja Lomholt's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1800

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: District 2 North

Voter ID: 001528244

Congressional District: 002

House District: 101

Senate District: 012

Sonja Lomholt Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sonja Lomholt

10 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2016
No known party affiliation
17 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2017
No known party affiliation
38 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2016
No known party affiliation
44 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2016
No known party affiliation
44 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2016
No known party affiliation
53 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2062
No known party affiliation
53 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2062
No known party affiliation
58 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2016
No known party affiliation
58 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2016
No known party affiliation
58 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2016
No known party affiliation
61 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2062
No known party affiliation
61 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2062
No known party affiliation
73 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2062
No known party affiliation
73 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2062
No known party affiliation
74 Forest Road, Madison, Ct 06443-2015
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $32,741

Net Worth: $372,583

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.