Pamella L Reid

Female, Age 54 Derby , Connecticut

Pamella L Reid is a 54 years old female, born on Thursday, 2nd of October 1969. She will turn 55 on October 02, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 219 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Pamella is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 5, 2016.

Overview of Pamella L Reid

Age: 54

Gender: female

Birth year: 1970

Lives in: Derby

Pamella L Reid's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 5, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 014

Polling place: Bradley Elementary School

Voter ID: 001331726

Congressional District: 003

House District: 114

Senate District: 017

Pamella L Reid Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Pamella L Reid

213 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2628
No known party affiliation
214 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2628
No known party affiliation
217 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
217 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
218 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
218 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
218 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
219 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
220 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
221 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
222 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
222 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
223 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
224 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation
224 Shagbark Drive, Derby , Ct 06418-2630
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $48,603

Net Worth: $959,128

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.