1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06492 Wallingford
  4. Mulligan Drive

Sandeep Reddy

Male, Age 62 Wallingford, Connecticut

Sandeep Reddy is a 62 years old male, born on Monday, 22nd of August 1960. He will turn 63 on August 22, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 29 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456 and is not affiliated with any political party. Sandeep is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 23, 2004.

Overview of Sandeep Reddy

Age: 62

Gender: male

Birth year: 1960

Lives in: Wallingford

Sandeep Reddy's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 23, 2004

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Dag Hammarskjold Middle School

Voter ID: 001283084

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

Sandeep Reddy Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

29 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sandeep Reddy

Gail Brophy Barry(75)
22 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5457
No known party affiliation
Ghislaine Dostie(83)
23 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456
No known party affiliation
Herman Dostie(85)
23 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456
No known party affiliation
Sandra J Norwood(79)
24 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5457
No known party affiliation
Joe David Norwood(81)
24 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5457
No known party affiliation
Brenda L Tyler(71)
26 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5457
No known party affiliation
Mary C Schnabel(74)
27 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456
No known party affiliation
Anna Theresa Miserendino(94)
35 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456
No known party affiliation
Joseph Di Natale(80)
37 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 29 Mulligan Drive, Wallingford, 06492-5456

Income

Salary: $104,978

Net Worth: $99,214

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.