William V Roland Jr

Male, Age 55 Wallingford, Connecticut

William V Roland Jr is a 55 years old male, born on Friday, 14th of April 1967. He will turn 56 on April 14, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 4 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704 and is not affiliated with any political party. William is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 13, 2007. Our records show Katherine A W Roland (52) as possible relative.

Overview of William V Roland Jr

Age: 55

Gender: male

Birth year: 1967

Lives in: Wallingford

William V Roland Jr's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 13, 2007

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Cook Hill School

Voter ID: 001255618

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

William V Roland Jr Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for William V Roland Jr

5 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
5 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
5 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
6 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
7 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
7 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
7 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
8 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
8 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
9 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation
9 Jennifer Lane, Wallingford, 06492-5704
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

William V Roland Jr's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Wallingford, Ct
Born on: Wednesday, 29th of October 1969
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $44,937

Net Worth: $795,213

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.