1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06385 Waterford
  4. Raymond Lane

Martha L Garvin

Unknown, Age 56 Waterford , Connecticut

Martha L Garvin is a 56 years old unknown gender, born on Wednesday, 4th of May 1966. This person will turn 57 on May 04, 2024. Our records show this person currently resides at 2 Raymond Lane, Waterford , 06385-1122 and is not affiliated with any political party. Martha is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 6, 1993. Our records show Steven D Garvin (58), Alexa N Garvin (28) and Brooke Elizabeth Garvin (25) as possible relatives.

Overview of Martha L Garvin

Age: 56

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1966

Lives in: Waterford

Martha L Garvin's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 6, 1993

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Oswegatchie School

Voter ID: 001012799

Congressional District: 002

House District: 038

Senate District: 020

Martha L Garvin Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

2 Raymond Lane, Waterford , 06385-1122

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Martha L Garvin

Marcia A Benvenuti(75)
1 Raymond Lane, Waterford , 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
Linda J Sullivan(69)
3 Raymond Lane, Waterford , 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
Susan Carol Locarno(59)
7 Raymond Lane, Waterford , 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
Joseph L Olbrys(83)
7 Raymond Lane, Waterford , 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 2 Raymond Lane, Waterford , 06385-1122

Related Persons

Martha L Garvin's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(58)
Waterford , Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 5th of November 1963
Gender: Male
(28)
Waterford , Ct
Born on: Wednesday, 15th of June 1994
Gender: Female
(25)
Waterford , Ct
Born on: Saturday, 9th of August 1997
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $45,645

Net Worth: $1,336,077

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.