Pamela A Salvati

Female, Age 67 Southington, Connecticut

Pamela A Salvati is a 67 years old female, born on Sunday, 12th of August 1956. She will turn 68 on August 12, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 183 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1844 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Pamela is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 24, 1996. Our records show Frederick F Salvati (68) as possible relative.

Overview of Pamela A Salvati

Age: 67

Gender: female

Birth year: 1957

Lives in: Southington

Pamela A Salvati's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 24, 1996

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 008

Polling place: Thalberg School

Voter ID: 000968969

Congressional District: 001

House District: 030

Senate District: 016

Pamela A Salvati Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Pamela A Salvati

133 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1844
No known party affiliation
138 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
138 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
158 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
158 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
170 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
170 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
184 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
184 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation
184 Tanglewood Drive, Southington, Ct 06489-1821
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Pamela A Salvati's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Southington, Ct
Born on: Saturday, 5th of February 1955
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $17,332

Net Worth: $1,471,396

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.