Betty Libby

Female, Age 86 Meriden, Connecticut

Betty Libby is a 86 years old female, born on Saturday, 24th of July 1937. She will turn 87 on July 24, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7021 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Betty is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 23, 2020.

Overview of Betty Libby

Age: 86

Gender: female

Birth year: 1938

Lives in: Meriden

Betty Libby's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 23, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 010

Polling place: St. John Lutheran Church

Voter ID: 000961423

Congressional District: 005

House District: 082

Senate District: 013

Betty Libby Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Betty Libby

818 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7020
No known party affiliation
818 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7020
No known party affiliation
834 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7020
No known party affiliation
834 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7020
No known party affiliation
842 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7020
No known party affiliation
842 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7020
No known party affiliation
842 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7020
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7021
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7021
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-0000
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-0000
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7021
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7021
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-7021
No known party affiliation
845 Paddock Avenue, Meriden, Ct 06450-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $104,123

Net Worth: $189,406

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.