Raphael Watts

Male, Age 84 Southington, Connecticut

Raphael Watts is a 84 years old male, born on Thursday, 8th of June 1939. He will turn 85 on June 08, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 31 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3041 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Raphael is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 27, 1960.

Overview of Raphael Watts

Age: 84

Gender: male

Birth year: 1939

Lives in: Southington

Raphael Watts's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 27, 1960

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Derynoski School

Voter ID: 000951922

Congressional District: 001

House District: 081

Senate District: 016

Raphael Watts Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Raphael Watts

6 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
14 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
24 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-0000
No known party affiliation
24 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
25 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3041
No known party affiliation
32 Raynor Street 2fl, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
42 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
52 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
52 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
52 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
52 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
52 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
52 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3040
No known party affiliation
55 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3041
No known party affiliation
65 Raynor Street, Southington, Ct 06489-3041
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $82,905

Net Worth: $1,107,189

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.