Robert L Aransky

Male, Age 94 Southington, Connecticut

Robert L Aransky is a 94 years old male, born on Tuesday, 25th of June 1929. He will turn 95 on June 25, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 339 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Robert is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 29, 1964.

Overview of Robert L Aransky

Age: 94

Gender: male

Birth year: 1930

Lives in: Southington

Robert L Aransky's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 29, 1964

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 009

Polling place: Tabernacle

Voter ID: 000950656

Congressional District: 001

House District: 030

Senate District: 016

Robert L Aransky Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Robert L Aransky

305 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
318 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1762
No known party affiliation
318 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1762
No known party affiliation
318 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1762
No known party affiliation
323 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
323 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
332 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1762
No known party affiliation
339 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
340 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1762
No known party affiliation
340 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1762
No known party affiliation
353 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
353 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
353 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
353 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1765
No known party affiliation
356 Lazy Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1762
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $78,621

Net Worth: $35,864

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.