Jackalyn Montalbon

Female, Age 55 Windham, Connecticut

Jackalyn Montalbon is a 55 years old female, born on Sunday, 3rd of November 1968. She will turn 56 on November 03, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 117 Elm Street 91, Windham, Ct 06226-2934 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jackalyn is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 18, 1988.

Overview of Jackalyn Montalbon

Age: 55

Gender: female

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Windham

Jackalyn Montalbon's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 18, 1988

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 000906497

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Jackalyn Montalbon Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jackalyn Montalbon

65 Elm Street A, Windham, Ct 06226-3111
No known party affiliation
65 Elm Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3111
No known party affiliation
99 Elm Street Bsmt, Windham, Ct 06226-2907
No known party affiliation
99 Elm Street 2, Windham, Ct 06226-2907
No known party affiliation
99 Elm Street 3, Windham, Ct 06226-2907
No known party affiliation
99 Elm Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2907
No known party affiliation
99 Elm Street 1, Windham, Ct 06226-2907
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street A93, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street 94, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street 88, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street 87, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street 94, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation
117 Elm Street 89, Windham, Ct 06226-2934
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $51,678

Net Worth: $343,822

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.