Alan W Krampfert

Male, Age 67 Prospect , Connecticut

Alan W Krampfert is a 67 years old male, born on Monday, 12th of March 1956. He will turn 68 on March 12, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 8 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872 and is not affiliated with any political party. Alan is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 24, 1994.

Overview of Alan W Krampfert

Age: 67

Gender: male

Birth year: 1956

Lives in: Prospect

Phone number: 203-758-4625

Alan W Krampfert's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 24, 1994

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Prospect Firehouse

Voter ID: 000852034

Congressional District: 003

House District: 089

Senate District: 016

Alan W Krampfert Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Alan W Krampfert

1 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
2 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
2 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
3 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
4 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
6 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
10 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
15 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
16 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1872
No known party affiliation
17 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1874
No known party affiliation
32 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1873
No known party affiliation
33 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1873
No known party affiliation
33 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1873
No known party affiliation
35 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1873
No known party affiliation
36 Valley Lane, Prospect , Ct 06712-1873
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $10,515

Net Worth: $312,364

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.