Gail Yaekerdaunis

Female, Age 72 Oxford , Connecticut

Gail Yaekerdaunis is a 72 years old female, born on Wednesday, 23rd of May 1951. She will turn 73 on May 23, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 107 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Gail is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1800.

Overview of Gail Yaekerdaunis

Age: 72

Gender: female

Birth year: 1951

Lives in: Oxford

Gail Yaekerdaunis's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1800

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Quaker Farms School

Voter ID: 000841870

Congressional District: 004

House District: 131

Senate District: 032

Gail Yaekerdaunis Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Gail Yaekerdaunis

102 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6109
No known party affiliation
102 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6109
No known party affiliation
105 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
105 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
105 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
106 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6109
No known party affiliation
106 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6109
No known party affiliation
107 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
107 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
114 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6109
No known party affiliation
114 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6109
No known party affiliation
117 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
117 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
117 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6108
No known party affiliation
118 Shelton Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-6109
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $24,955

Net Worth: $1,659,492

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.