James F Kohn

Unknown, Age 68 Guilford , Connecticut

James F Kohn is a 68 years old unknown gender, born on Saturday, 2nd of October 1954. This person will turn 69 on October 02, 2024. Our records show this person currently resides at 201 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911 and is not affiliated with any political party. James is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1980.

Overview of James F Kohn

Age: 68

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1954

Lives in: Guilford

James F Kohn's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1980

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Abraham Baldwin School

Voter ID: 000515202

Congressional District: 003

House District: 098

Senate District: 012

James F Kohn Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for James F Kohn

70 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1907
No known party affiliation
165 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
165 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
200 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1954
No known party affiliation
200 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1954
No known party affiliation
200 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1954
No known party affiliation
201 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
221 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
221 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
221 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
225 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
225 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
231 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
231 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation
231 Saw Mill Road, Guilford , 06437-1911
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $99,662

Net Worth: $767,149

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.