Judi R Mcdermotteggert

Female, Age 72 Guilford , Connecticut

Judi R Mcdermotteggert is a 72 years old female, born on Wednesday, 29th of March 1950. She will turn 73 on March 29, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 31 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1941 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Judi is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1980.

Overview of Judi R Mcdermotteggert

Age: 72

Gender: female

Birth year: 1950

Lives in: Guilford

Judi R Mcdermotteggert's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1980

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Abraham Baldwin School

Voter ID: 000514643

Congressional District: 003

House District: 098

Senate District: 012

Judi R Mcdermotteggert Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Judi R Mcdermotteggert

31 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1941
No known party affiliation
40 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1939
No known party affiliation
40 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1939
No known party affiliation
64 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1939
No known party affiliation
64 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1939
No known party affiliation
76 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1939
No known party affiliation
88 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1939
No known party affiliation
88 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1939
No known party affiliation
120 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1910
No known party affiliation
121 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1941
No known party affiliation
135 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1941
No known party affiliation
135 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1941
No known party affiliation
135 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1941
No known party affiliation
135 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1941
No known party affiliation
148 Mirror Lane, Guilford , 06437-1910
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $60,409

Net Worth: $1,034,163

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.