Jane H Keydel

Female, Age 91 Essex , Connecticut

Jane H Keydel is a 91 years old female, born on Friday, 29th of January 1932. She will turn 92 on January 29, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 30 Bokum Road 136, Essex , Ct 06426-1540 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jane is registered to vote in Connecticut since December 13, 2018.

Overview of Jane H Keydel

Age: 91

Gender: female

Birth year: 1932

Lives in: Essex

Phone number: 860-767-1505

Jane H Keydel's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: December 13, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Essex Town Hall 01

Voter ID: 000477729

Congressional District: 002

House District: 036

Senate District: 033

Jane H Keydel Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jane H Keydel

13 Bokum Road, Essex , Ct 06426-0000
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 11, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 312, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 201, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 7, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 248, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 266, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 265, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 358, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 109, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 111, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 17, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 141, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 2, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation
30 Bokum Road 243, Essex , Ct 06426-1510
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $74,823

Net Worth: $1,156,025

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.