1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06475 Old Saybrook
  4. Lakewood Circle

Virginia Baldi

Female, Age 78 Old Saybrook, Connecticut

Virginia Baldi is a 78 years old female, born on Tuesday, 20th of February 1945. She will turn 79 on February 20, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 3 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Virginia is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 16, 1970.

Overview of Virginia Baldi

Age: 78

Gender: female

Birth year: 1946

Lives in: Old Saybrook

Phone number: 860-388-4121

Virginia Baldi's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 16, 1970

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Old Saybrook High School Gymnasium

Voter ID: 000473140

Congressional District: 002

House District: 023

Senate District: 033

Virginia Baldi Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

3 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Virginia Baldi

Lauren A Ashe(48)
1 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
Bror J Ashe(48)
1 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
Ethan Michael Russell(25)
2 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
Beth L Russell(57)
2 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
Timothy J Russell(57)
2 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
David R Spencer(42)
5 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
Linda K Spencer(71)
5 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
Louis A Spencer(72)
5 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 3 Lakewood Circle, Old Saybrook, Ct 06475-1129

Income

Salary: $22,609

Net Worth: $273,883

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.