Edith M Simon

Female, Age 76 Wallingford, Connecticut

Edith M Simon is a 76 years old female, born on Wednesday, 30th of July 1947. She will turn 77 on July 30, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 55 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821 and is not affiliated with any political party. Edith is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 24, 2006.

Overview of Edith M Simon

Age: 76

Gender: female

Birth year: 1947

Lives in: Wallingford

Phone number: 203-265-0791

Edith M Simon's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 24, 2006

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Dag Hammarskjold Middle School

Voter ID: 000469932

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

Edith M Simon Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Edith M Simon

45 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
47 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
47 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
49 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
49 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
49 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
53 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
57 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
57 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
65 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
67 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation
69 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-0000
No known party affiliation
71 Old Village Circle, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4821
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $82,801

Net Worth: $834,559

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.