John J Rusckowski

Unknown, Age 73 Torrington , Connecticut

John J Rusckowski is a 73 years old unknown gender, born on Friday, 15th of September 1950. This person will turn 74 on September 15, 2024. Our records show this person currently resides at 170 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4414 and is not affiliated with any political party. John is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1800.

Overview of John J Rusckowski

Age: 73

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1950

Lives in: Torrington

Phone number: 860-489-7281

John J Rusckowski's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1800

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Coe Park 1

Voter ID: 000439574

Congressional District: 001

House District: 064

Senate District: 030

John J Rusckowski Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for John J Rusckowski

140 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4414
No known party affiliation
140 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4414
No known party affiliation
142 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4414
No known party affiliation
149 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4413
No known party affiliation
149 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4413
No known party affiliation
163 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4413
No known party affiliation
163 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4413
No known party affiliation
170 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4414
No known party affiliation
177 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4413
No known party affiliation
191 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4413
No known party affiliation
191 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4413
No known party affiliation
200 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4484
No known party affiliation
200 Homestead Road, Torrington , Ct 06790-4484
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $19,488

Net Worth: $471,452

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.