1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06037 Berlin
  4. Castlewood Drive

Doris Vazquez

Female, Age 62 Berlin, Connecticut

Doris Vazquez is a 62 years old female, born on Wednesday, 11th of October 1961. She will turn 63 on October 11, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 230 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Doris is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 18, 1998.

Overview of Doris Vazquez

Age: 62

Gender: female

Birth year: 1962

Lives in: Berlin

Doris Vazquez's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 18, 1998

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Senior Center

Voter ID: 000317666

Congressional District: 001

House District: 083

Senate District: 006

Doris Vazquez Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

230 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950

Show Map

Mailing Address

230 Castlewood Drive, Kensington, Ct 06037

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Doris Vazquez

Richard A Del Biondo(67)
209 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2951
No known party affiliation
Patricia R Del Biondo(66)
209 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2951
No known party affiliation
Diane Violet Rakowicz(32)
216 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950
No known party affiliation
Martha E Rakowicz(35)
216 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950
No known party affiliation
Halina Rakowicz(60)
216 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950
No known party affiliation
Tommy P Rakowicz(30)
216 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950
No known party affiliation
Eileen Gail Kozlowski(71)
223 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2951
No known party affiliation
Barbara A Salonia(63)
230 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 230 Castlewood Drive, Berlin, Ct 06037-2950

Income

Salary: $28,365

Net Worth: $1,261,207

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.