Philip David Miner

Male, Age 67 Waterford , Connecticut

Philip David Miner is a 67 years old male, born on Friday, 8th of April 1955. He will turn 68 on April 08, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 24 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1504 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Philip is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 2, 2018.

Overview of Philip David Miner

Age: 67

Gender: male

Birth year: 1955

Lives in: Waterford

Philip David Miner's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 2, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Oswegatchie School

Voter ID: 000148133

Congressional District: 002

House District: 038

Senate District: 020

Philip David Miner Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Philip David Miner

20 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1504
No known party affiliation
20 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1504
No known party affiliation
21 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation
21 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation
22 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1504
No known party affiliation
23 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation
23 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation
24 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1504
No known party affiliation
25 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation
25 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation
26 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1504
No known party affiliation
27 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation
28 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1504
No known party affiliation
28 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-0000
No known party affiliation
29 Fulmore Drive, Waterford , 06385-1503
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $6,825

Net Worth: $1,369,757

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.