Betty Mike

Female, Age 65 Tolland, Connecticut

Betty Mike is a 65 years old female, born on Friday, 30th of August 1957. She will turn 66 on August 30, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 96 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Betty is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1800.

Overview of Betty Mike

Age: 65

Gender: female

Birth year: 1958

Lives in: Tolland

Phone number: 860-872-9846

Betty Mike's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1800

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: The Gym At Tolland Recreation Center 1

Voter ID: 000119723

Congressional District: 002

House District: 053

Senate District: 035

Betty Mike Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Betty Mike

68 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
68 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
76 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
76 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
82 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
82 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
88 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
104 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
104 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-4034
No known party affiliation
122 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-3524
No known party affiliation
122 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-3524
No known party affiliation
127 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-3522
No known party affiliation
127 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-3522
No known party affiliation
127 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-3522
No known party affiliation
130 Anthony Road, Tolland, Ct 06084-3519
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $97,472

Net Worth: $132,310

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.