Jo E Machesky

Female, Age 26 New Haven , Connecticut

Jo E Machesky is a 26 years old female, born on Thursday, 30th of November 1995. She will turn 27 on November 30, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 4 Eld Street 2, New Haven , 06511-3816 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jo is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 31, 2018.

Overview of Jo E Machesky

Age: 26

Gender: female

Birth year: 1996

Lives in: New Haven

Jo E Machesky's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 31, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 007

Polling place: Hall Of Records 02

Voter ID: 004984066

Congressional District: 003

House District: 096

Senate District: 011

Jo E Machesky Adress & Maps

Residential Address

4 Eld Street 2, New Haven , 06511-3816

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jo E Machesky

2 Eld Street 4, New Haven , 06511-3844
No known party affiliation
2 Eld Street 6, New Haven , 06511-3844
No known party affiliation
2 Eld Street 5, New Haven , 06511-3844
No known party affiliation
2 Eld Street, New Haven , 06511-3844
No known party affiliation
2 Eld Street 3, New Haven , 06511-3844
No known party affiliation
2 Eld Street 4, New Haven , 06511-3844
No known party affiliation
3 Eld Street 2, New Haven , 06511-3815
No known party affiliation
4 Eld Street, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation
4 Eld Street 4, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation
4 Eld Street 1, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation
4 Eld Street 2, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation
4 Eld Street 1, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation
4 Eld Street 3, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation
8 Eld Street 2, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation
8 Eld Street 2, New Haven , 06511-3816
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $62,244

Net Worth: $1,959,873

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.