Matthew Vecsey

Male, Age 45 Wallingford, Connecticut

Matthew Vecsey is a 45 years old male, born on Thursday, 16th of June 1977. He will turn 46 on June 16, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 4 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Matthew is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 30, 2018. Our records show Erin Jean Vecsey (46) as possible relative.

Overview of Matthew Vecsey

Age: 45

Gender: male

Birth year: 1977

Lives in: Wallingford

Matthew Vecsey's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 30, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Dag Hammarskjold Middle School

Voter ID: 004980387

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

Matthew Vecsey Adress & Maps

Residential Address

4 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Matthew Vecsey

2 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
2 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
5 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4831
No known party affiliation
7 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
7 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
7 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
7 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
7 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
7 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
12 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation
12 Penn Drive, Wallingford, 06492-4832
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Matthew Vecsey's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Wallingford, Ct
Born on: Thursday, 25th of March 1976
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $28,265

Net Worth: $717,739

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.