Kayleigh Giles

Female, Age 23 Hamden , Connecticut

Kayleigh Giles is a 23 years old female, born on Wednesday, 29th of March 2000. She will turn 24 on March 29, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 44 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772 and is not affiliated with any political party. Kayleigh is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 24, 2018.

Overview of Kayleigh Giles

Age: 23

Gender: female

Birth year: 2001

Lives in: Hamden

Kayleigh Giles's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 24, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 008

Polling place: Bear Path School

Voter ID: 004972327

Congressional District: 003

House District: 091

Senate District: 017

Kayleigh Giles Adress & Maps

Residential Address

44 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kayleigh Giles

32 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
32 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
36 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
36 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
36 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
40 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
40 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
44 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
44 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
44 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
44 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
44 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
48 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
48 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation
48 Quarry Lane, Hamden , Ct 06518-1772
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $117,598

Net Worth: $654,290

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.