Mucio Osvaldo Magona

Male, Age 27 Windham, Connecticut

Mucio Osvaldo Magona is a 27 years old male, born on Friday, 23rd of August 1996. He will turn 28 on August 23, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 144 Union Street 6, Windham, Ct 06226-3050 and is not affiliated with any political party. Mucio is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 26, 2018.

Overview of Mucio Osvaldo Magona

Age: 27

Gender: male

Birth year: 1996

Lives in: Windham

Phone number 860-457-8405

Mucio Osvaldo Magona's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 26, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 004948305

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Mucio Osvaldo Magona Adress & Maps

Residential Address

144 Union Street 6, Windham, Ct 06226-3050

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Mucio Osvaldo Magona

126 Union Street 2, Windham, Ct 06226-3004
No known party affiliation
129 Union Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3067
No known party affiliation
129 Union Street 2, Windham, Ct 06226-3067
No known party affiliation
129 Union Street Bsmt, Windham, Ct 06226-3067
No known party affiliation
133 Union Street Apt 5, Windham, Ct 06226-3066
No known party affiliation
133 Union Street 2, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
133 Union Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3036
No known party affiliation
144 Union Street Apt 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3050
No known party affiliation
144 Union Street 1, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
144 Union Street 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3050
No known party affiliation
144 Union Street 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3050
No known party affiliation
151 Union Street Bsmt, Windham, Ct 06226-3061
No known party affiliation
151 Union Street Apt 2, Windham, Ct 06226-3061
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $59,238

Net Worth: $988,220

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.