Kim E Hughes

Female, Age 56 Windham, Connecticut

Kim E Hughes is a 56 years old female, born on Monday, 3rd of April 1967. She will turn 57 on April 03, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 53 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1316 and is not affiliated with any political party. Kim is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 22, 2017.

Overview of Kim E Hughes

Age: 56

Gender: female

Birth year: 1967

Lives in: Windham

Kim E Hughes's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 22, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 007

Polling place: Windham Center Fire Dept

Voter ID: 004808791

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Kim E Hughes Adress & Maps

Residential Address

53 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1316

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kim E Hughes

50 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1325
No known party affiliation
50 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1325
No known party affiliation
51 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1316
No known party affiliation
51 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1316
No known party affiliation
51 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1316
No known party affiliation
52 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1325
No known party affiliation
52 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1325
No known party affiliation
54 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-0000
No known party affiliation
54 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1325
No known party affiliation
55 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-0000
No known party affiliation
55 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-0000
No known party affiliation
57 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1316
No known party affiliation
57 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-0000
No known party affiliation
59 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-1316
No known party affiliation
59 Larrow Drive, Windham, Ct 06256-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $78,698

Net Worth: $837,105

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.