Kimberly Oneil Marko

Female, Age 41 New Milford, Connecticut

Kimberly Oneil Marko is a 41 years old female, born on Saturday, 17th of July 1982. She will turn 42 on July 17, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 5 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Kimberly is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 15, 2016. Our records show Scott A Marko (41) as possible relative.

Overview of Kimberly Oneil Marko

Age: 41

Gender: female

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: New Milford

Kimberly Oneil Marko's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 15, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Catherine E Lillis Building

Voter ID: 004698450

Congressional District: 005

House District: 067

Senate District: 030

Kimberly Oneil Marko Adress & Maps

Residential Address

5 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kimberly Oneil Marko

4 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
4 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
4 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
6 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
6 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
7 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
7 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
8 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
8 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation
10 Mill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3619
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Kimberly Oneil Marko's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

New Milford, Ct
Born on: Friday, 17th of September 1982
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $27,874

Net Worth: $1,231,156

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.