Jarry Lee

Female, Age 30 Stamford , Connecticut

Jarry Lee is a 30 years old female, born on Thursday, 25th of March 1993. She will turn 31 on March 25, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 67 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jarry is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 12, 2016.

Overview of Jarry Lee

Age: 30

Gender: female

Birth year: 1993

Lives in: Stamford

Jarry Lee's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 12, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 021

Polling place: Scofield Middle School

Voter ID: 004691784

Congressional District: 004

House District: 147

Senate District: 036

Jarry Lee Adress & Maps

Residential Address

67 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jarry Lee

45 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
45 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
45 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
54 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
54 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
54 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
59 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
67 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
67 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
76 Haviland Court Cottage, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
76 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
76 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
83 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation
196 Haviland Court, Stamford , Ct 06903-3331
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $107,312

Net Worth: $1,618,416

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.