Gaglul Islam

Male, Age 45 Naugatuck , Connecticut

Gaglul Islam is a 45 years old male, born on Thursday, 2nd of March 1978. He will turn 46 on March 02, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 185 Wisteria Drive U26, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237 and is not affiliated with any political party. Gaglul is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 16, 2019.

Overview of Gaglul Islam

Age: 45

Gender: male

Birth year: 1978

Lives in: Naugatuck

Phone number 203-500-2714

Gaglul Islam's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 16, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 002

Polling place: Central Avenue School

Voter ID: 004483157

Congressional District: 003

House District: 070

Senate District: 017

Gaglul Islam Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Gaglul Islam

157 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
159 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
160 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5238
No known party affiliation
165 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
166 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5238
No known party affiliation
179 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
179 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
193 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
193 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
193 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
197 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
197 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5237
No known party affiliation
201 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-5243
No known party affiliation
201 Wisteria Drive, Naugatuck , Ct 06770-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $101,026

Net Worth: $1,059,069

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.