Leigha Kim Casey

Female, Age 42 Waterford , Connecticut

Leigha Kim Casey is a 42 years old female, born on Wednesday, 19th of March 1980. She will turn 43 on March 19, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 12 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410 and is not affiliated with any political party. Leigha is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 3, 2017.

Overview of Leigha Kim Casey

Age: 42

Gender: female

Birth year: 1980

Lives in: Waterford

Leigha Kim Casey's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 3, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Oswegatchie School

Voter ID: 004347057

Congressional District: 002

House District: 038

Senate District: 020

Leigha Kim Casey Adress & Maps

Residential Address

12 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Leigha Kim Casey

1 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1440
No known party affiliation
1 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1440
No known party affiliation
4 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
10 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
10 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
11 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1409
No known party affiliation
11 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1409
No known party affiliation
12 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
12 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
12 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
16 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
16 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1410
No known party affiliation
17 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1409
No known party affiliation
17 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1409
No known party affiliation
17 Park Drive, Waterford , 06385-1409
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $83,122

Net Worth: $1,298,098

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.