Leonardo Vazquez

Male, Age 50 Waterbury , Connecticut

Leonardo Vazquez is a 50 years old male, born on Monday, 14th of May 1973. He will turn 51 on May 14, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 90 Rosario Drive D, Waterbury , Ct 06708-0000 and is not affiliated with any political party. Leonardo is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 24, 2012. Our records show Luis L Vazquez (30) as possible relative.

Overview of Leonardo Vazquez

Age: 50

Gender: male

Birth year: 1973

Lives in: Waterbury

Leonardo Vazquez's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 24, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 03

District: 071

Polling place: Tinker School

Voter ID: 004304051

Congressional District: 003

House District: 071

Senate District: 015

Leonardo Vazquez Adress & Maps

Residential Address

90 Rosario Drive D, Waterbury , Ct 06708-0000

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Leonardo Vazquez

79 Rosario Drive, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4565
No known party affiliation
79 Rosario Drive 1, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4565
No known party affiliation
79 Rosario Drive 1, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4565
No known party affiliation
82 Rosario Drive, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4564
No known party affiliation
82 Rosario Drive, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4564
No known party affiliation
82 Rosario Drive 4, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4564
No known party affiliation
88 Rosario Drive, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4522
No known party affiliation
90 Rosario Drive, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4522
No known party affiliation
90 Rosario Drive 2, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4522
No known party affiliation
90 Rosario Drive 2, Waterbury , Ct 06708-4522
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Leonardo Vazquez's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Waterbury , Ct
Born on: Sunday, 16th of May 1993
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $53,709

Net Worth: $1,378,466

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.